2026
reporting yearFinancials
Revenue—
OpEx—
FTE—
Market cap (FY-end)—
Climate
Scope 1—
Scope 2 (market)—
Scope 2 (location)—
Scope 3 total—
RVBA-SKANS▲Listed
Skanska
Construction & Contractors·Engineering & Construction
SKAB (STO)·Stockholm·SE
Verified credentials
SBTi Validated1.5°CCDP Listed
Company website
Decarbonisation trajectory · all scopes
Scope 3· base 2020 · 1.2M tCO2e
Headline intensities
·Values in USD ($)
Peer cohort: Construction & Contractors · lower is betterRevenue intensity
Carbon / $m revenue
—tCO2e / $m revenue
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
—
Operational intensity
Carbon / $m OpEx
—tCO2e / $m OpEx
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
—
Economic intensity
Carbon / $m EVIC
—tCO2e / $m EVIC
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
—
Asset intensity
Carbon / $m PP&E + leased
—tCO2e / $m PP&E
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
—
Asset intensity (full)
Carbon / $m PP&E + leased S3
—tCO2e / $m PP&E
Carbon per million dollars of physical infrastructure — PP&E plus leased real-estate, including upstream and downstream leased emissions (Scope 3 categories 8 + 13). The most complete view of physical-asset carbon intensity, relevant for REITs and infrastructure-heavy firms.
—
Targets
Near-term
3 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2030 | −70% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2015 | 2030 | −70% | In corporate strategy | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2030 | −50% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 50% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 20.0% by now. −0.0% reductionof −50% target · 0% there | Off track |
Long-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2045 | −1% | insufficient data | — | |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2045 | −90% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 90% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 14.4% by now. −0.0% reductionof −90% target · 0% there | Off track |
Net zero
1 target| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2045 | — | In corporate strategy | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
no Scope 1 + 2 trajectory data
Scope 3 trajectory vs target
Scope 3 · 50% by 2030
ActualLinear1.5°C
Partial profile
We haven't fully researched Skanska yet.
Request a full evidence-chained profile — we'll dig into their carbon, nature, social & water disclosure, find their facilities and sources, and email you when it's ready.
We’ll only use your email to notify you about this request.