Jacobs
Headline intensities
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
Carbon per FTE (full-time-equivalent employee) — the diagnostic measure for people-leveraged businesses where headcount, not capital, drives delivery. Captures the office, energy and travel footprint per person.
Climate action evidence
10 records · 1 source- Nature-based removals32,100 tCO2e(30%)
- Avoidance / reductions43,001 tCO2e(40%)
- Unclassified31,750 tCO2e(30%)
- 30,000 tCO2e
- 20,000 tCO2e
- 20,000 tCO2e
- 15,000 tCO2e
- 8,000 tCO2e
- 5,100 tCO2e
- 5,000 tCO2e
- 2,000 tCO2e
- · berkeley_voluntary_registry
Targets
Near-term
3 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2019 | 2030 | −50% | 1.5°C | 8.8% reduction achieved vs 50% target (18% of the way there). Linear pace expects 22.7% by now. −8.8% reductionof −50% target · 18% there | Off track |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2019 | 2030 | −50% | 46.8% reduction achieved vs 50% target (94% of the way there). Linear pace expects 22.7% by now. −46.8% reductionof −50% target · 94% there | On track | |
| Scope 3 | 2019 | 2025 | −65% | 46.8% reduction achieved vs 65% target (72% of the way there). Linear pace expects 54.2% by now. −46.8% reductionof −65% target · 72% there | Off track |
Long-term
1 target| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3Absolute | 2019 | 2040 | −90% | 1.5°C | 42.2% reduction achieved vs 90% target (47% of the way there). Linear pace expects 21.4% by now. −42.2% reductionof −90% target · 47% there | On track |
Net zero
1 target| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2019 | 2040 | — | 1.5°C | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
Latest news· last 5 of 34
full news log →- 2025Launch of PlanBeyond 2025+ sustainability approach
- 2024Ongoing double materiality assessment under ESRS
- 2024Added emissions from post-FY19 acquisitions to baseline
- 2024FY19 recalculated baseline and FY24 data verified by LRQA (limited assurance)
- 2024FY19 Baseline rebaselined to remove SpinCo Business and reflect methodology improvements