2025
reporting yearFinancials
Revenue—
OpEx—
FTE—
Market cap (FY-end)—
Climate
Scope 1—
Scope 2 (market)—
Scope 2 (location)—
Scope 3 total—
RVBA-TELIA◇Private
Telia
SE
Verified credentials
SBTi Validated1.5°C
Decarbonisation trajectory · all scopes
Scope 3· base 2018 · 628k tCO2e
Headline intensities
·Values in USD ($)
Peer cohort: — · lower is betterRevenue intensity
Carbon / $m revenue
—tCO2e / $m revenue
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
—
Operational intensity
Carbon / $m OpEx
—tCO2e / $m OpEx
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
—
Economic intensity
Carbon / $m EVIC
—tCO2e / $m EVIC
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
—
Asset intensity
Carbon / $m PP&E + leased
—tCO2e / $m PP&E
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
—
Climate action evidence
8 records · 2 sourcesCarbon credits retired
41,236 tCO2e
8 retirements · FYNaN–NaN · third-party verified
By credit quality
- Durable removals26,871 tCO2e(65%)
- Avoidance / reductions14,365 tCO2e(35%)
Renewable electricity
No third-party REC retirements on file and no self-reported renewable share disclosed.
Sources
- · berkeley_voluntary_registry
- · Puro.earth Registry
Registry retirements are direct evidence; commitments are forward-looking pledges. EPA snapshot covers FY2019–FY2020.
Targets
Near-term
3 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2018 | 2030 | −90% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2018 | 2030 | 834,024 tCO2e | NA | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2018 | 2025 | −29% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 29% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 24.9% by now. −0.0% reductionof −29% target · 0% there | Off track |
Long-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2018 | 2040 | −90% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2018 | 2040 | −90% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 90% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 24.5% by now. −0.0% reductionof −90% target · 0% there | Off track |
Net zero
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2018 | 2040 | — | 1.5°C | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2040 | — | In corporate strategy | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
no Scope 1 + 2 trajectory data
Scope 3 trajectory vs target
Scope 3 · 28.999999999999996% by 2025
ActualLinear1.5°C
Partial profile
We haven't fully researched Telia yet.
Request a full evidence-chained profile — we'll dig into their carbon, nature, social & water disclosure, find their facilities and sources, and email you when it's ready.
We’ll only use your email to notify you about this request.