2026
reporting yearFinancials
Revenue—
OpEx—
FTE—
Market cap (FY-end)—
Climate
Scope 1—
Scope 2 (market)—
Scope 2 (location)—
Scope 3 total—
RVBA-LOREA◇Private
L'Oreal
FR
Verified credentials
SBTi Validated1.5°C
Decarbonisation trajectory · all scopes
Scope 3· base 2019 · 7.2M tCO2e
Headline intensities
·Values in USD ($)
Peer cohort: — · lower is betterRevenue intensity
Carbon / $m revenue
—tCO2e / $m revenue
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
—
Operational intensity
Carbon / $m OpEx
—tCO2e / $m OpEx
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
—
Economic intensity
Carbon / $m EVIC
—tCO2e / $m EVIC
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
—
Asset intensity
Carbon / $m PP&E + leased
—tCO2e / $m PP&E
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
—
Climate action evidence
14 records · 2 sourcesCarbon credits retired
130,174 tCO2e
14 retirements · FYNaN–NaN · third-party verified
By credit quality
- Avoidance / reductions130,174 tCO2e(100%)
Renewable electricity
No third-party REC retirements on file and no self-reported renewable share disclosed.
Sources
- · berkeley_voluntary_registry
- · CarbonPlan OffsetsDB
Registry retirements are direct evidence; commitments are forward-looking pledges. EPA snapshot covers FY2019–FY2020.
Targets
Near-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2019 | 2030 | −57% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2019 | 2030 | −28% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 28% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 12.7% by now. −0.0% reductionof −28% target · 0% there | Off track |
Long-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2019 | 2050 | −90% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3 | 2019 | 2050 | −90% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 90% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 14.5% by now. −0.0% reductionof −90% target · 0% there | Off track |
Net zero
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2019 | 2050 | — | 1.5°C | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2050 | — | In corporate strategy | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
no Scope 1 + 2 trajectory data
Scope 3 trajectory vs target
Scope 3 · 28.000000000000004% by 2030
ActualLinear1.5°C
Partial profile
We haven't fully researched L'Oreal yet.
Request a full evidence-chained profile — we'll dig into their carbon, nature, social & water disclosure, find their facilities and sources, and email you when it's ready.
We’ll only use your email to notify you about this request.