Infosys
Headline intensities
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
Carbon per FTE (full-time-equivalent employee) — the diagnostic measure for people-leveraged businesses where headcount, not capital, drives delivery. Captures the office, energy and travel footprint per person.
Climate action evidence
28 records · 2 sources- Avoidance / reductions278,001 tCO2e(81%)
- Unclassified64,916 tCO2e(19%)
- 76,100 tCO2e
- 64,213 tCO2e
- 48,113 tCO2e
- 46,065 tCO2e
- 36,617 tCO2e
- 33,077 tCO2e
- 18,648 tCO2e
- 13,721 tCO2e
- · berkeley_voluntary_registry
- · RE100
Targets
Near-term
7 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2020 | 2035 | −38% | Well-below 2°C | 21.5% reduction achieved vs 38% target (57% of the way there). Linear pace expects 5.0% by now. −21.5% reductionof −38% target · 57% there | On track |
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2020 | 2025 | −13% | Well-below 2°C | 21.5% reduction achieved vs 13% target (172% of the way there). Linear pace expects 5.0% by now. −21.5% reductionof −13% target · 172% there | On track |
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2020 | 2030 | 34,852 tCO2e | Not validated | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2030 | — | Achieved (externally validated) | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2025 | −13% | 16.0% reduction achieved vs 13% target (128% of the way there). Linear pace expects 10.0% by now. −16.0% reductionof −13% target · 128% there | On track | |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2035 | −38% | 16.0% reduction achieved vs 38% target (43% of the way there). Linear pace expects 10.0% by now. −16.0% reductionof −38% target · 43% there | On track | |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2030 | 106,051 tCO2e | Not validated | absolute-value target | — |
Net zero
1 target| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3Absolute | 2020 | 2040 | — | Achieved (externally validated) | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
Latest news· last 5 of 18
full news log →- 2023ESG Vision 2030 ambitions
- 2023Net zero by 2040 commitment via Climate Pledge
- 2023Supplier ESG assessments expanded
- 2023KPMG external assurance for select non-financial disclosures
- 2022Responsible supply chain ESG assessment launched for top 100 suppliers