Daiichi Sankyo
Headline intensities
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
Climate action evidence
0 records · 0 sourcesStrategy & approach
How the firm describes its decarbonisation approach in its own words — alongside the headline numbers above. Self-reported, page-cited.
Member of RE100 with a target of 100% renewable electricity by FY2030 and FY2025 KPI of ≥60% (already achieved). Renewable electricity utilization reached 80.0% in FY2023 (up from 9.4% in FY2021 and 78.1% in FY2022). Approach combines on-site solar (Pfaffenhofen Plant Germany 580 MWh/yr; Shanghai Plant ~540 MWh/yr; Onahama Plant ~4,000 MWh/yr), conversion of European plant to biomass wood pellets for steam in FY2023, and renewable electricity contracts. Group also opened its first Nearly ZEB-certified building at Onahama in March 2023 (78% energy reduction).
Report does not describe a removals or offsets programme. Strategy is framed around absolute Scope 1+2 reduction (49.8% vs FY2015) plus supplier engagement on Scope 3 Cat 1, en route to FY2050 net zero. Ecological Footprint metric tracks 'CO2 absorption area' as an indicator but is not used as a credit/removal mechanism.
- Renewable electricity procurement at manufacturing sites
Conversion of plants to renewable electricity is the dominant Scope 1+2 lever: Pfaffenhofen has used 100% renewable electricity since 2014; Shanghai plant added solar in Jan 2023 cutting 300 tCO2/yr; on-site solar systems at Onahama (4,000 MWh/yr) and elsewhere. Result: Scope 2 fell from 103,150 tCO2 in FY2021 to ~24,000 tCO2 in FY2022-23.
- Net Zero Energy Buildings and energy efficiency
First Nearly ZEB-certified building (Onahama new office, March 2023) cuts standard building energy by 78% (51.9% from savings, 26.9% from on-site generation via solar + high-efficiency HVAC, water heating, lighting). Listed levers across value chain include DX utilization, green chemistry, next-gen batteries, EVs and hydrogen.
- Fuel switching to biomass and hydrogen at plants
FY2023 conversion to biomass wood pellets for steam production at the Pfaffenhofen plant in Germany. Long-term plan explicitly lists hydrogen utilization and bioplastics as value-chain decarb levers across R&D, pharmaceutical technology, supply chain and offices.
- Supplier engagement on 1.5°C targets (Scope 3 Cat 1)
FY2025 KPI is for >70% of business partners to set 1.5°C-aligned targets. Currently strengthening engagement to address rising Cat 1 emissions, which grew from 0.5M to 3.9M tCO2e between FY2021 and FY2023 due partly to methodology revision. CO2 intensity-per-sales target: -15% vs FY2020 by FY2025.
- Sustainable Procurement Survey of suppliers (Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1)
Triennial Sustainable Procurement Survey covering six areas including environmental management. FY2020-FY2022 cycle: 399 of 403 surveyed suppliers responded (99%); 30 key partners took environmental training. Retrospective assessment of ~1,200 raw materials extended survey to Non-Tier 1 suppliers at five main Japanese plants.
Targets
Near-term
4 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2030 | −63% | 1.5°C | 42.9% reduction achieved vs 63% target (68% of the way there). Linear pace expects 33.6% by now. −42.9% reductionof −63% target · 68% there | On track |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2015 | 2030 | −63% | In corporate strategy | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 63% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 33.6% by now. −0.0% reductionof −63% target · 0% there | Off track |
| Scope 2 | 2015 | 2030 | −1% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3 | 2020 | 2030 | −71% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 71% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 21.2% by now. −0.0% reductionof −71% target · 0% there | Off track |
Long-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2040 | −90% | 1.5°C | 42.9% reduction achieved vs 90% target (48% of the way there). Linear pace expects 28.8% by now. −42.9% reductionof −90% target · 48% there | On track |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2050 | −90% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 90% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 9.0% by now. −0.0% reductionof −90% target · 0% there | Off track |
Net zero
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2015 | 2050 | — | 1.5°C | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2050 | — | In corporate strategy | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
Latest news· last 5 of 15
full news log →- 2024TNFD Adopter (May 2024)
- 2023CDP A List 2023
- 2023Scope 3 Cat 1 calculation methodology revised
- 2023Supplier engagement target: 70% of suppliers on 1.5°C
- 2023SDG alignment — Goal 3 and Goal 17