Daiichi Sankyo
Headline intensities
Carbon per million dollars of revenue. The legacy industry-standard reference (CDP, MSCI). Useful for cross-sector context, but distorted by margin — high-margin firms appear artificially efficient. Read alongside the operational and asset intensities for the full picture.
OpEx (operating expenditure) is the running cost of the business — staff, services, energy, materials. This shows how carbon-intensive operations are per million dollars of spend. Removes the margin distortion that revenue-based ratios introduce.
EVIC (Enterprise Value Including Cash) is the firm's total capital footprint — equity + debt + cash + minority interest. The EU's standard intensity measure (SFDR PAI 3) — answers: how much carbon does each million of capital deployed in this business produce?
PP&E (Property, Plant & Equipment) plus leased real-estate assets is the firm's physical infrastructure on the balance sheet. This shows the carbon intensity of that physical footprint — uses Scope 1+2+3 for consistency with the other headline intensities. Surfaces stranded-asset risk for asset-heavy firms.
Climate action evidence
0 records · 0 sourcesStrategy & approach
How the firm describes its decarbonisation approach in its own words — alongside the headline numbers above. Self-reported, page-cited.
Daiichi Sankyo is a member of RE100 and aims for 100% renewable electricity by FY2030, with FY2025 KPI of at least 60%. Achieved 80.0% in FY2023. Key initiatives include: Pfaffenhofen Plant (Germany) on 100% renewable electricity since 2014 with on-site 580 MWh solar; Shanghai Plant ~540 MWh solar (saving 300 tCO2/yr); Onahama Plant ~4,000 MWh solar with Nearly ZEB-certified new office cutting energy use by 78%. Also converting to biomass wood pellets for steam.
No narrative on durable removals approach in the firm's most recent reports.
- Energy efficiency and ZEB buildings
Constructed Group's first Nearly ZEB-certified office at Onahama Plant (March 2023), cutting standard building energy consumption by 78% (51.9% from energy savings, 26.9% from on-site generation). Combines high-efficiency air conditioning, water heating, and lighting equipment.
- On-site solar PV and renewable electricity procurement
Group installing self-consumption solar PV at major plants (Pfaffenhofen 580 MWh, Shanghai 540 MWh, Onahama 4,000 MWh) and converting purchased electricity to renewable sources. Drove renewable electricity from 9.4% (FY2021) to 80.0% (FY2023), cutting market-based Scope 2 from 103,150 to 23,994 tCO2e.
- Fuel switch to biomass and hydrogen utilization
In FY2023, Pfaffenhofen Plant began converting to renewable fuels using biomass wood pellets for steam production. Long-term value chain initiatives also include hydrogen utilization, next-generation batteries, and electric vehicles.
- Green chemistry and sustainable manufacturing
Group identifies Green Chemistry (manufacturing process considering global environment, reducing raw material and energy consumption) and bioplastics utilization as decarbonisation levers across R&D, pharmaceutical technology, and supply chain.
- Supplier 1.5°C engagement (Scope 3 Cat 1)
FY2025 KPI: have more than 70% of business partners set 1.5°C-aligned targets. Group is strengthening engagement because Scope 3 Cat 1 (purchased goods and services) dominates the footprint at 3.9M tCO2e in FY2023. Also set FY2025 target of 15% reduction in CO2 emission intensity based on sales (Scope 3 Cat 1) vs FY2020.
Targets
Near-term
4 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2030 | −63% | 1.5°C | 42.9% reduction achieved vs 63% target (68% of the way there). Linear pace expects 33.6% by now. −42.9% reductionof −63% target · 68% there | On track |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2015 | 2030 | −63% | In corporate strategy | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 63% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 33.6% by now. −0.0% reductionof −63% target · 0% there | Off track |
| Scope 2 | 2015 | 2030 | −1% | 1.5°C | insufficient data | — |
| Scope 3 | 2020 | 2030 | −71% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 71% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 21.2% by now. −0.0% reductionof −71% target · 0% there | Off track |
Long-term
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2Absolute | 2015 | 2040 | −90% | 1.5°C | 42.9% reduction achieved vs 90% target (48% of the way there). Linear pace expects 28.8% by now. −42.9% reductionof −90% target · 48% there | On track |
| Scope 3Absolute | 2020 | 2050 | −90% | 0.0% reduction achieved vs 90% target (0% of the way there). Linear pace expects 9.0% by now. −0.0% reductionof −90% target · 0% there | Off track |
Net zero
2 targets| Scope | Base | Target | Reduction | Alignment | Progress | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | 2015 | 2050 | — | 1.5°C | absolute-value target | — |
| Scope 1 + 2 + 3 | — | 2050 | — | In corporate strategy | absolute-value target | — |
⚠ Some targets show progress vs the earliest extracted year as a baseline approximation. The real base-year value will be used once historical reports are extracted.
Progress · absolute tCO2e
Latest news· last 5 of 13
full news log →- 2024Registered as TNFD Adopter
- 2023Scope 3 Cat 1 calculation methodology revised
- 2023Biomass wood pellet conversion at Pfaffenhofen Plant
- 2023Primary: Energy efficiency and ZEB buildings
- 2023Dependent: Green chemistry and sustainable manufacturing