Architecture & Engineering · transition pathways
← all sectorsThe recognised primary transition pathway for architecture & engineering, plus the upstream sectors architecture & engineering firms depend on for their own decarbonisation. A consulting firm cutting business travel still needs aviation to decarbonise; a REIT cutting tenant energy still needs the grid to clean up. These are the rate limiters.
SBTi 1.5°C + Architects Declare + RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge sets per-typology operational + embodied targets for designed buildings. Architects Declare commits firms to advocate + design for net zero. SBTi corporate pathway covers own operations.
Reference ↗Hover the chart to read off Best / Realistic / Worst values at any year. Click to pin the readout.
Best 0% · Worst 70%
Upstream sectors architecture & engineering firms rely on. The faster these decarbonise, the faster the firm can hit its own targets — even when it does everything in its control.
Cement & Steel
Specified embodied carbonDesign specifications drive what materials are used. Decarbonisation of concrete + steel sets the floor for what's possible at design stage.
Source: GCCA Net Zero Roadmap, ResponsibleSteel, IEA NZE Industry
Power & electricity
Scope 2 + downstream operationalOwn studio energy is grid-bound. Faster grid decarbonisation also cuts the operational footprint of every building specified.
Source: IEA WEO 2023 — NZE / APS / STEPS
Aviation
Scope 3 · cat 6Project travel for global firms — site visits, client engagement.
Source: IATA Fly Net Zero, ICAO LTAG, BAU (~3% pa growth)
Once we have HQ + operations location data per firm in this cohort, we'll overlay Ember grid-carbon-intensity data per country so you can see the geographical decarbonisation tailwind (or headwind) each firm is operating against.
Source: ember-energy.org · Global Electricity Review + per-country grid carbon intensity (gCO2/kWh).